A Rocket Stove is probably so named because the vertical column of flame in it resembles that of a rocket’s. The flame however does not descend as in a rocket, but rise. The updraft thus created, draws ample air to completely burn firewood. The net result is that the stove is smoke free, economic in firewood use and fast to cook with.
It was invented by Dr Larry Winiarski about a decade ago. There is growing interest in it worldwide, among people who have been searching for the ideal cook stove for the poor. It has been found that respiratory diseases among poor women are traceable to long hours spent cooking in unventilated indoors using smoky stoves. The Rocket Stove addresses all these issues with great simplicity. In addition, making do as it does with twigs and slender sticks as fuel, a Rocket Stove has a beneficial impact on the environment. Women are also spared long treks in search of cooing fuel.
Winiarski has stated the principles governing design at this link. If that is too rigourous read, a quick illustrated explanation
is found here. Simply speaking, a Rocket Stove consists of two pipes arranged in a L-shape; the vertical limb, [usually about 400mm or 18″] is longer than the horizontal. The horizontal limb is where the fuel is introduced. Some free space is ensured here for combustion air to be drawn. Fire is begun using an oily rag, paper, straw or pine needles. Slender twigs are then placed over the fire and once they catch, larger sticks may be introduced. Soon the initial smoke ceases and there is a steady brisk column of fire. Heat is controlled by pushing in or pulling out firewood. [This site has a good review of various wood stoves, their merits/demerits and finally a simple Rocket Stove design]
Looking back on the first Rocket Stove project at pointReturn, it is now clear it was both too large for current needs and over ambitious in design. I was building a stove that can cook for a dozen people who are not yet on the horizon. An over creative approach led to incorporation of a two-pot top with a damper control and two baking boxes. It was fun to design and build though. It engaged five of us on a full fun-filled day. You can see the detailed drawings I made at this link. You can also choose to run them as a correctly sequenced instructional slideshow. Caption in each frame explains the step.
But before you build one like that, here is a critical review. The size as I said, is too large. On the day it was inaugurated it did cook for 26 people but such a stove is more efficient when it is used regularly, more or less all day, as in hostels and restaurants. Chunky lengths of firewood are required to sustain a robust vertical flame. In other words the design is for a professional cooking.
Sure I would like to get one such rocket stove.
I am in Chennai.
varaahan@rediffmail.com
sujatha…
firewood remains the fuel for a majority of india’s poor. one is better off reducing the quantities used and making them smoke free. that’s what rocket stoves do. in any case, use of twigs and brushwood found in neighbourhoods is quite sustainable.
briquettes are a good route too but they need a centralised unit and some manufacturing skill. they’d certainly be wonderful if they are easily available everywhere, which they are not. till that catches on efficient smoke free stoves seem a good bet
-dv
dear sir,
regarding the fuel for the stove,since firewood has been a cause of deforestation,what do you think of biomass briquettes made by simple machines ,with locally available materials?can making briquettes and simple briquette making machines, also help in providing some income to villagers or urban slum dwellers?
http://www.youtube.com/user/BeavertonRotary
http://www.gorpproductions.com/fostvideo.html
warm regards,
sujatha
marupa…
pot-in-pot refrigeration works best when humidity is low, unlike at pointReturn
-dv
sujatha…
stoves achieve freedom from smoke by ensuring sufficient updraft, which makes plenty of air for combustion available. how do they manage that is the issue. the designs you have flagged use tall chimneys, which are good if they are affordable.
then comes replicability at user level.
evaluated from these points of view, pointReturn’s pottery Rocket Stove appears to have some advantages
-dv
DV,
Now that you have solved the problem of cooking, am sure you must be working on how to preserve what has been cooked.
Check this out, this idea can be improved by you and applied in pointreturn am sure.
http://permaculture.org.au/2008/08/11/a-refrigerator-that-runs-without-electricity/
Best.
dear sir,
with reference to efficient wood burning stoves,have you heard about the sarala ole and the astra ole?there is some information regarding them here –
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/oct102004/926.pdf
http://www.teri.res.in/terragreen/issue42/feature.htm
http://www.tide-india.org/products/06household-cooking-stoves.html
http://www.pciaonline.org/files/Proceedings/2007IndiaProceedings/pdf/1.8%20Srinivas.pdf
what do you think about them as compared to the rocket stove?
warm regards,
sujatha
Hi DV
May ramalingam and his folks have busy schedule. I had seen stoves made from tin with a small hole near bottom and centrally packed with husk being used. its cost was about 40Rs 30 years back but only packing husk was a skilled issue. may this news spread to many in our myriad villages. thannx
yes marupa…
a rough brush draws the ash out on to a tray. the ash is used as fertiliser and scrub powder for cleaning up pots
Hi DV,
Very interesting. One question though. I have seen pot based stoves in my village when I was a kid ( about 25 yrs ago)but they were open and not rocket science ( i mean rocket stove technique).
How do you handle the issue of ashes accumulating from burnt out firewood? did you face that issue?
May a ‘pushin – pullout’ removable base layer underneath the vertical shaft separated by a steel grill collect all the ashes that can be removed ?